Explore Kaplan Floor Planner: But Designers Often Need a Second Classroom Planning Tool

Kaplan’s Classroom FloorPlanner remains a reliable solution for planning fixed, standards-based classrooms in early education and K-6 environments, especially when the goal is to confirm the final layout, align with a predefined furniture catalog, and prepare a purchasing list.

However, the design phase of a classroom project often begins long before procurement. At that stage, the layout is still evolving, multiple configurations may need to be compared, and visual communication becomes part of the decision-making process. This is where teams shift from a single fixed layout toward a more iterative classroom layout workflow, where the priority is not to lock a final plan, but to test, refine, and present different spatial options before anything is ordered.

In other words, Kaplan works well when the classroom is already defined. But when the classroom is still being imagined—when a designer must show two, three, or six different teaching configurations—the workflow itself changes, and so do the expectations placed on the tool.

Where Kaplan Is Still the Correct Tool

Kaplan’s FloorPlanner continues to be the right choice whenever the classroom:

1. Uses a predefined furniture catalog
2. Requires only one final accepted layout
3. Will be purchased and installed exactly as drawn
4. Does not need advanced visual output or client-side presentation files
5. Exists as a single room, not a multi-zone environment
6. Is being configured by facilities, procurement, or administrative staff

In this context, Kaplan supports accuracy, SKU clarity, and efficient purchasing.

If the project requires only one confirmed layout, Kaplan is not just acceptable—it is efficient.

Why Designers Run Into Limitations When Using a Procurement-Focused Tool

The purpose of a design-phase workflow is fundamentally different from a procurement workflow.

For this reason, many design teams introduce a second tool during concept development—often a flexible online floor plan tool that supports rapid iteration and visual export instead of locking the space to a single procurement layout.

save pin

Two Tool Categories: Procurement vs Design Workflow

That is why design teams frequently pair Kaplan with a 2D + 3D classroom planner during concept development rather than trying to stretch a procurement-optimized tool into a design tool.

Real-World Scenarios: When Designers Must Use a Second Tool

Legend:

Yes = fully supported

Possible but slow = not optimized for design workflow

Not supported = requires additional software

How to Tell If You Have Outgrown a Procurement-Only Workflow

You have crossed into a design-phase workflow if:

1. You must generate more than one layout option for the same room
2. You need 3D visuals, interior renders, or presentation-ready exports
3. Furniture is not tied to a single vendor catalog
4. The room function changes by schedule, age group, or teaching method
5. You are designing more than one room or multiple campuses
6. You need to export walkthrough or share-link previews
7. You must reuse layout templates instead of redrawing from scratch

At that point, you are no longer doing procurement modeling.

You are doing design work—and a separate tool category is expected, such as classroom layout software for designers.

FAQ (10 Questions)

1. Does this mean Kaplan is outdated or inadequate?

No. Kaplan still performs well for its intended use case: fixed classroom layouts aligned with its furniture catalog.

2. Are designers replacing Kaplan with other tools?

No. They are adding an earlier-stage design tool, not removing Kaplan from procurement.

3. Can both tools be used in the same project?

Yes. The most common workflow is: Design → Approval → Procurement.

4. Why do designers need multiple layout versions?

Because stakeholders need to see and compare options before committing to one configuration.

5. Why is 3D visualization becoming standard in education spaces?

Because classroom layout affects pedagogy, movement, and engagement—not just furniture placement.

6. Is Kaplan meant to be used by architects or designers?

It is primarily intended for school administrators, program directors, and purchasing teams.

7. What is the biggest limitation for designers using Kaplan?

Lack of custom furniture, limited visual export, and no batch/template support.

8. Can Kaplan handle multi-zone learning environments?

It can model a single room, but it is not built for full-facility sequencing.

9. Why do multi-campus education brands need a second tool?

Because they must reuse layouts across 10–50+ locations and maintain visual and spatial consistency.

10. What is the best way to combine the two-tool workflow?

Designers create multi-scenario layouts in a design-phase tool, then hand the approved version to Kaplan for final procurement alignment.

Final Takeaway

The shift in tooling is not based on whether Kaplan is “good enough.”

It is based on the task:

Procurement asks: “Can we execute this exactly as drawn?”

Design asks: “Which layout communicates the best learning experience?”

That is why procurement and design are no longer the same workflow—and no longer require the same software.

Kaplan still belongs in the procurement phase.

Designers simply need an additional tool when the classroom is still being imagined.