660 Sq Ft vs 700 Sq Ft vs 800 Sq Ft House Plans Which Size Works Best for a 2 Bedroom Home: A practical comparison of three popular small house sizes to help you choose the most efficient two bedroom layout.Daniel HarrisApr 25, 2026Table of ContentsDirect AnswerQuick TakeawaysIntroductionUnderstanding Small House Size Categories in IndiaLayout Differences Between 660, 700, and 800 Sq Ft HomesSpace Efficiency in 2 Bedroom DesignsAnswer BoxCost Differences for Each House SizeWhich Size Works Best for Different Family TypesPros and Cons of Choosing a 660 Sq Ft HouseFinal SummaryFAQFree floor plannerEasily turn your PDF floor plans into 3D with AI-generated home layouts.Convert Now – Free & InstantDirect AnswerFor most families planning a compact two bedroom home, the real difference between 660 sq ft, 700 sq ft, and 800 sq ft house plans comes down to layout efficiency rather than total size. A well-designed 660 sq ft home can function almost as comfortably as a 700 sq ft layout, while 800 sq ft offers noticeably more flexibility for storage, circulation, and slightly larger rooms.If the plot is tight or the budget is limited, 660 sq ft is often sufficient. If comfort and resale value matter more, 700–800 sq ft tends to provide a more forgiving layout.Quick TakeawaysA smart 660 sq ft layout can function well for small families when space planning is highly efficient.700 sq ft homes typically provide better bedroom proportions and circulation.800 sq ft layouts allow more flexibility for storage, dining areas, and furniture placement.Construction cost differences are often smaller than people expect.Layout quality matters far more than the extra 40–100 sq ft.IntroductionOver the past decade designing compact homes, I’ve seen countless homeowners struggle with the same decision: choosing between 660 sq ft vs 700 sq ft vs 800 sq ft house plans for a two bedroom home. On paper, those numbers seem close. In real houses, though, the difference can completely change how the home feels day to day.In many Indian urban plots, every square foot matters. A poorly planned 800 sq ft house can actually feel tighter than a carefully designed 660 sq ft layout. That’s why I always recommend homeowners experiment with a simple experiment with a simple online floor plan creator before committing to construction. Seeing the rooms drawn to scale often reveals problems that numbers alone hide.In this guide, I’ll walk through the real design differences between these three small house sizes, including layout flexibility, cost implications, and which option tends to work best for different family types.save pinUnderstanding Small House Size Categories in IndiaKey Insight: In the Indian housing market, homes between 600 and 800 sq ft represent the most common entry-level size for two bedroom layouts.In dense cities and smaller towns alike, compact homes dominate new construction. Land costs push homeowners toward smaller footprints, which is why 2 bedroom houses typically fall into three practical size brackets.600–660 sq ft: ultra-compact two bedroom layouts680–720 sq ft: balanced small homes with slightly larger bedrooms780–820 sq ft: comfortable small homes with more flexibilityOne thing many homeowners underestimate is circulation space. Hallways, door clearance, and furniture movement often consume 8–12% of total floor area. In very small homes, losing even 20 sq ft to inefficient circulation can significantly affect usability.According to housing studies from the National Building Organisation in India, small urban homes increasingly prioritize open living areas rather than isolated rooms. That trend is exactly why smaller layouts can sometimes feel larger than their square footage suggests.Layout Differences Between 660, 700, and 800 Sq Ft HomesKey Insight: The biggest difference between these house sizes is not room count but how comfortably the rooms connect.From a designer’s perspective, the extra 40–140 square feet mainly improves circulation and room proportions.Typical layout differences:660 sq ft: compact living room, two small bedrooms, combined dining area, minimal storage700 sq ft: slightly wider living space and more comfortable bedroom layout800 sq ft: clearer zoning between living, dining, and private roomsOne hidden design issue appears around 660 sq ft layouts: furniture conflicts. Beds, wardrobes, and door swings compete for space. This is where testing layouts visually helps. Many clients I work with like tosave pintest furniture placement in a realistic room planning tool before finalizing the plan.That simple step often reveals whether a bedroom can truly fit a queen bed and wardrobe comfortably.Space Efficiency in 2 Bedroom DesignsKey Insight: Efficient zoning can make a 660 sq ft house perform almost like a 700 sq ft home.After designing dozens of small homes, I’ve noticed that efficiency often depends on three design strategies:Open living and dining areas instead of separate roomsShared walls between bedrooms and bathroomsMinimal internal corridorsCommon space-saving techniques include:save pinSliding doors for bathroomsWall-mounted wardrobesMulti-use dining tablesCorner kitchen layoutsA surprising mistake I frequently see is oversized living rooms. In small houses, allocating too much space to the living area shrinks bedrooms dramatically. Balanced proportions usually produce a better overall experience.Answer BoxFor a two bedroom home, 700 sq ft is often the sweet spot between affordability and comfort. However, a well-planned 660 sq ft layout can work efficiently, while 800 sq ft offers noticeably better circulation and storage.Cost Differences for Each House SizeKey Insight: The construction cost difference between these three sizes is smaller than most homeowners expect.Many people assume that jumping from 660 to 800 sq ft dramatically increases cost. In reality, the percentage difference is moderate because several expenses remain fixed.FoundationBathroom plumbingElectrical systemsKitchen installationApproximate cost comparison pattern:save pin660 sq ft home → baseline cost700 sq ft home → about 5–7% higher800 sq ft home → about 12–15% higherThe hidden cost difference often comes from finishes rather than structure. Flooring, cabinetry, wardrobes, and fixtures scale with space and can push the budget higher.Which Size Works Best for Different Family TypesKey Insight: The ideal house size depends more on lifestyle than household size.Based on my project experience, here’s how each size typically fits different situations.660 sq ft: couples, retirees, or small families with one child700 sq ft: young families who want slightly larger bedrooms800 sq ft: families needing storage, workspace, or dining areaAnother overlooked factor is future flexibility. Families often underestimate how quickly storage needs grow. Even an extra 80–100 sq ft can prevent overcrowding later.Pros and Cons of Choosing a 660 Sq Ft HouseKey Insight: A 660 sq ft house is highly efficient but requires extremely careful planning.ProsLower construction costEasier to maintainFits smaller urban plotsFaster construction timelineConsLimited storage spaceTighter bedroomsLess flexibility for furnitureFuture expansion may be harderIf you're unsure whether a compact layout will work, it helps to see how a compact two bedroom layout looks in full 3D before building. Visualizing the space at scale can quickly reveal whether the rooms feel comfortable.Final Summary660 sq ft homes work well when layouts are highly efficient.700 sq ft often provides the best balance of comfort and cost.800 sq ft homes offer noticeably better circulation and storage.Layout quality matters more than the extra square footage.Visual planning tools help avoid costly design mistakes.FAQIs 660 sq ft enough for a 2 bedroom house?Yes, a 660 sq ft layout can accommodate two bedrooms if the plan is highly efficient and avoids wasted corridor space.Which is better 660 or 700 sq ft house?A 700 sq ft home usually offers slightly larger bedrooms and better circulation, making it more comfortable for small families.Is 800 sq ft considered a small house?Yes. In many urban areas, 800 sq ft is still considered a compact home, but it offers noticeably more layout flexibility.What is the best small house size for 2 bedrooms?Many designers consider 700–750 sq ft the most practical size for a comfortable two bedroom layout.Can a 660 sq ft house include a dining area?Yes, but it is usually combined with the living room to save space.Does a bigger house size increase construction cost a lot?Not dramatically. Many structural costs remain fixed, so increases are often moderate.What layout works best for small 2 bedroom homes?Open living spaces, shared plumbing walls, and minimal corridors usually create the most efficient layouts.Are 660 sq ft vs 700 sq ft vs 800 sq ft house plans very different?The room count is similar, but 800 sq ft plans generally offer better circulation and furniture flexibility.Convert Now – Free & InstantPlease check with customer service before testing new feature.Free floor plannerEasily turn your PDF floor plans into 3D with AI-generated home layouts.Convert Now – Free & Instant